They’re gay…so what?他们正在同性恋…那又怎样呢？
May 16, 2008 2008年5月16日
The California supreme court defies 40 million californians and overrides a law voted in a general state vote that made it law that banned marriage between people of the same sex. A vote of 4 to 3 by the court chose to override 40 million people. Homosexual morality has just been voted by the 4 people that override millions. This sets a precedent to the entire country that may start a domino effect of courts voiding state laws that ban marriage between the same sex. This is significant because it shows that the US supreme court could override any law in the US that may be moral or that may give us religious freedoms on worship.加州最高法院无视40000000加州和凌驾于法律投了一票的一般状况，使得它的法律，禁止结婚两国人民的同一性别的。的一票为4比3 ，由法院选择凌驾4000多万人。同性恋道德刚刚被选为由4人覆盖以百万计，这树立了一个先例，对整个国家可能开始一场多米诺骨牌效应法院排尿国家法律禁止的婚姻之间的相同性别的，这是重要，因为它表明，美国联邦最高法院可以凌驾于任何法律，在美国可能的道德，或者可能给我们宗教的自由就崇拜。 -Submitted by Brian B. -提交由Brian乙 
While I don’t believe that homosexuality is right as a Christian, I do believe that homosexuals have rights as Americans.虽然我不认为同性恋是正确的作为一个基督徒，我相信同性恋者有权利作为美国人。 I think the court was correct in upholding the Constitutional rights of homosexuals whether most of Americans agree or not!我认为法院是正确的，坚持的宪法权利，同性恋者是否大多数的美国人同意或不！ At one time it was not popular for courts to support the rights of minorities!在同一时间它不是流行法院支持少数群体的权利！ I understand that as Christians this seems like two very separate issues, but as Americans they are not.据我所知，作为基督徒，这好像两个非常不同的问题，但作为美国人，他们是不会。 This country was founded on freedom, and I don’t think that we will be winning anyone over by suppressing anyone’s freedom to live as they choose.这个国家是建立在自由，我不认为我们会赢得任何人压制任何人的生活的自由，因为他们的选择。 Plus how can we effectively argue a case for religious freedom and at the same time withhold freedom from others?再加上我们如何能有效地辩称，案件宗教自由和在同一时间，扣压免于别人呢？
I think the best way to combat this problem is not by becoming political minded, but by reaching out–Christ minded!我认为最好的方式，以对付这个问题是不是成为政治的头脑，而是由接触-基督的态度！ Hate the sin, love the sinner…仇恨罪，爱罪人…